micronuclei in oral epithelial cells in early stage can
help clinicians in the initiation of preventive measures.
Exfoliative cytological study of oral cells is a
non-aggressive technique and its application in the
early diagnosis of PMDs is well-established. The assay
is reliable and technically easy to perform. Early
detection and early intervention of oral cancer can
prolong life expectancy and reduce the years of life lost,
indicating the importance of proactive screening and
oral hygiene.
Numerous DNA specific stains available are
used to study the micronuclei and chromosomal
abnormalities within the cells. Many investigators
investigated a variety of stains including DAPI,
acridine orange (AO), Hoechst, and propidium iodide,
Feulgen-Fast Green (FFG), May-Grunwald Giemsa
(Giemsa) and Papanicolaou (Pap). Feulgen-Fast Green
(FFG) which enable easy identification of Micronuclei,
making it clearly stand among other stains. However,
relatively lengthy procedures may result in theunder-
scoring of Micronuclei. Many comparative studies of
micronuclei using stains were performed in the past.
Casartelli et al. evaluated Hoechst, PI, and Giemsa, and
found Hoechst was the more reliable for staining and
identifying micronuclei.Giemsa, FFG, DAPI, and
acridine orange stains' comparison show that Giemsa is
more associated with falsification of micronuclei and
FFG is better than other stains.The Papanicolaou (Pap)
stain was the preferred method of detecting micronuclei
in oral epithelial cells when compared to Giemsa stain.
The fluorescent staining (acridine orange) was more
sensitive for micronuclei detection than FFG in oral
exfoliated cells in subjects of leukoplakia and
squamous cell carcinoma. Studies are needed to
determine whether some micronuclei and nuclei may
lose DNA through karyolysis while maintaining the
protein structure of chromatin and the nuclear
envelope, so that they would still be detectable by stains
that are not DNA-specific.
Looking at the present scenario, we decided to
evaluate micronuclei index in exfoliated cells using
Hematoxylin and Eosin stain (H&E), Papanicolaou's
stain (PAP), May Grunwald's stain (MGG) among the
OPMD's cell samples. The objective of study was: (a)to
determine micronuclei index among OPMD's and
OSCC, (b)to determine efficacy of H & E, PAP, MGG
stains for staining and identifying micronuclei, (c)
comparisons of H&E, PAP, MGG in OPMD's.
MATERIALS &METHODS:
The study was approved by the Research
ethical committee, PCDS & RC and study was
Microbiology. The subjects were pooled from the
outpatient department based on criteria and divided
into four groups as follows: (a) subjects withoral
s u b m u c o u s f i b r o s i s a n d l a t e r c o n f i r m e d
histopathologically as dysplastic lesions, (b) subjects
with clinical leukoplakia and later confirmed
histopathologically as dysplastic lesions, (c) subjects
with clinical lichen planus and later confirmed
histopathologically as dysplastic lesions(d) healthy
subjects without history or habit of SLT chewing or any
other form of tobacco consumption. Each group was
comprised of 20 subjects. Written consent was
obtained from subjects after explaining the purpose of
study.
Collection of sample and processing:
Subjects were asked to rinse the oral cavity
with saline before obtaining the cytology sample.
Standard exfoliative cytology procedure was used to
collect samples from site. The scrapes were taken with
the help of a sterile metal spatula. The sample was
transferred to a clean glass slide and fixed with alcohol.
These slides were dried for 5-10 minutes and stained
with H&E, PAP and MGG. All stained slides were
examined at 1000X magnification using oil immersion
objective under Binocular research Microscope
(Olympus CH 20i, Olympus, India). Minimum 5 slides
were prepared and screened for cell yield. Those with
greater cell yield were selected for evaluation and
counting of micronuclei. Minimum two slides for each
stain per subject were counted. Micronuclei were
counted as per Tolbert's criteria: (a) Rounded smooth
perimeter suggestive of a membrane. (b) Less than a
third the diameter of the associated nucleus, but large
enough to discern shape and color, (c) Staining
intensity like that of the nucleus, texture like that of
nucleus, (d) Same focal plane as nucleus and absence
of overlap with, or bridge to, the nucleus. Only those
structures fulfilling the above-mentioned criteria were
recorded as MNi (Figure 1). 720 slides were prepared,
and 1000 cell/slide were counted for micronuclei. 7,
20,000 cells were counted in total. The gathered data
was analyzed using unpaired t- test and chi-square test.
RESULTS:
The mean number of micronuclei were
observed using H&E, PAP and MGG stain in subjects
with OSMF. Mean micronuclei index was found high
(p<0.001) using H &E stain (12.20) than PAP (8.20)
and MGG (5.40)[Graph 1].The mean number of
micronuclei were observed using H&E, PAP and MGG
stain in subject with leukoplakia. Mean micronuclei
conducted at Department of Oral Pathology & index was found high (p<0.001) using H &E stain